Natalia Grace Adoptive parents Michael and Kristine: Abused

Natalie Grace’s adoptive parents, Michael and Kristine Barnett, have attracted the attention of legal and public institutions due to allegations of abuse.

Natalia Grace is a disabled Ukrainian orphan with dwarfism. The case takes a new twist as she confronts her adoptive father, Michael Barnett, over sordid claims of abuse.

She was adopted by Michael and Kristine Barnett in 2010. She faced years of accusations from her adoptive parents. They even asked the judge to change her legal age from eight to 22.

Now, in a six-part documentary series called The unusual case of Natalia Grace: Natalia speaksshares his side of the story.

This article details Natalia’s case, focusing on the actions and allegations of her adoptive parents, Michael and Kristina Barnett.

Natalia Grace adopted by Michael and Kristine Barnett

Natalija Grace’s adoptive mother parentsMichael and Kristine Barnett, were embroiled in a tumultuous legal saga marked by accusations.

Kristine and Michael Barnett were photographed during their detention for allegedly neglecting Natalia Grace. (Source: Sun)

The story begins in 2010 when Michael and Kristine Barnett adopted Natalia Grace. He has spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita, a rare genetic disorder that causes dwarfism.

The couple was initially told that Natalija was six years old. They later expressed doubt about her age.

The situation escalated when Kristine discovered her pubic hair while trying to bathe. Also, Natalia’s hidden menstrual cycle came to light.

The Barnetts were confused and worried. They cited “evidence” that Natalia was older than claimed and took steps to change her legal age to 22.

In trend with famous geniuses: Is Cole Pennington related to Chad Pennington? Father Son Age Difference and Family

The accusations against Natalija by her adoptive parents are disturbing and include a number of claims.

Natalia Grace Abuse Case Update: What Did Her Parents Do?

The case of abuse of Natalia Grace Update revealed a disturbing series of allegations.

Natalia Grace adoptive parents
In 2010, when Natalija was adopted by the Barnetts through the agency, they found out that she was six years old at the time. (Source: independent)

In 2019, Kristine Barnett alleged that Natalia threatened to stab the family in their sleep. She also pushed her against an electric fence and even poured bleach into her coffee, saying, “I’m trying to poison you.”

In 2019, the Barnetts were taken into custody on charges of child neglect. It was after they left Natalia in the apartment in Indiana and moved to Canada.

Michael was acquitted in October 2022, while Kristine’s case was dismissed in March 2023. Closing the case of Natalia Grace’s abuse brought both relief and other questions.

In October 2022, Michael was acquitted of child neglect charges in connection with the abandonment of Natalia in an apartment in Indiana. Subsequently, in March 2023, Kristina Barnett’s case was dismissed.

Also read: Are Reeza Hendricks and Beuran Hendricks related? Age difference between brother and family

The trial ended with the charges against Kristina Barnett being dismissed, leaving the case in limbo.

Parents Michael and Kristine Barnett accused Natalia Grace

Michael and Kristina Barnett’s accusations against Natalia are both confusing and serious.

They claimed that Natalia was not a child but a dangerous sociopath with murderous tendencies. The Barnetts claimed Natalia tried to kill them, holding a knife and hovering over their bed.

These claims, however, are disputed by Natalia, who vehemently denies any murderous intentions. documentaries, The unusual case of Natalia Grace: Natalia speakssheds light on Natalia’s side of the story.

It was a challenging narrative constructed by her adoptive parents. Natalia, in the documentary series, claims her innocence and challenges the lies constructed by the Barnettis.

Article of similar category: Is Jamie Yuccas Pregnant With Her Husband John Sheehan? News about married life and babies

Medical evidence, including DNA testing to determine her chronological age, showed she was closer to 22 when the Barnetts claimed she was only eight.

Leave a Comment