Miron disaster: The committee recommended to the Legal Adviser to the Government, Gali Baharab Miara, to continue investigating the person in charge of security at the event: Reuven ben Galwho was the main security director of the revelry, and Major General Shmuel Piamante, who was the head of the security and licensing branch in the North District of the Israel Police. Piamente was considered to have found the findings in his case particularly serious. Both were held personally responsible.
Netanyahu’s concept of placing responsibility at a distance died today in agony Ben Caspit
Miron disaster: the recordings that reveal the political pressures and warnings that were ignored
The committee recommended that Piamenta terminate his position with the police, and that he not be employed in any position related to revelry or the Miron compound. The committee also recommended that the legal advisor to the government be required to provide findings concerning the conduct related to the licensing of the event and how to continue an examination or investigation in their matter.
Reuven Ben Gal, the chief security director of the Tel Aviv party, was advised that in the future he would not be able to fulfill the role of a security director at mass events. In addition, it was recommended that the legal advisor to the government be required to provide findings regarding civil security and consider how to continue an inspection or investigation in their matter. -Inspector Shmuel Piamenta, head of the Security and Licensing Branch in the Northern District of the Israel Police, the committee also imposed personal responsibility and believed that the findings in his case were particularly serious.
The Institute of Forensic Medicine in Abu Kabir after the disaster in Miron. Photo: Avshalom Sassooni
With regard toFellow writerthe head of the Marom HaGalil regional council, the committee imposed personal responsibility on Sofer and believed that The findings in his case are particularly serious. But since it is an elected official, the committee decided thatnot to recommend an operative recommendation in his case and leave the matter to the dictates of his conscience and the test of the public.
On Eng. Amer Khaliliyathe safety engineer of the Hailol Tashfa committee is responsible for personal responsibility, and believed that the findings in his case were particularly serious. The committee recommended that he He will not be able to hold a position in the future of a safety engineer or safety consultant, that the registrar of engineers and architects will examine his continued eligibility for an engineer’s license, and that The Legal Adviser to the Government will be required for the findings concerning him and the question of renewing the criminal investigation in his case.
On Shimon Malkaa security manager at the Tashfa revelry, the committee also imposed personal responsibility, and recommended that he would not be able to play the role of a security manager at mass events in the future. In addition, She recommended that the legal advisor to the government be required to make findings regarding civil security and consider how to continue an inspection or investigation in their matter.
The committee charged the rabbi Joseph Schweingerthe CEO of the National Center for the Development of the Holy Places, personal responsibility and believed that the findings in his case are particularly serious. More recommended that he finish his term immediately in the position of director of the National Center for the Development of the Holy Places and that he will not be employed in any position related to the revelry or the Miron complex.
on a sub-perpendicular Maurice Chenhead of the Security and Licensing Division in the Israel Police at the time of the disaster, the committee imposed personal responsibility and recommended that the findings and conclusions in Chen’s case They will be taken into account in any discussion about promotion in rank or assignment to positions in the continuation of his service in the police.
On Shimon Levi, commander of the Northern District of the Israel Police at the time of the disaster, the committee also held Bavi personally responsible. The committee also noted that Levi He took responsibility immediately after the incident, and that later he even drew personal conclusions and resigned from his position. In doing so, the committee believed, Lavi drove as expected of a commander and according to the values of the police command. The committee noted that since June 30, 2023 he no longer serves in the police.
on a sub-perpendicular Hello Avitanthe commander of Merhav Emkim in the Israel Police at the time of the disaster, the committee imposed personal responsibility, noting that apparently the findings in his case would have led to the recommendation that his position as commander of Merhav Emkim be terminated, however This recommendation became redundant in light of Avitan’s retirement from the police.
on a deputy superintendent Assaf Mansourthe commander of the Nof HaGilil station in the Israel Police at the time of the disaster, held Mansour personally responsible, and stated that apparently the findings in his case would have led to a recommendation that his tenure as commander of the Nof HaGilil station be terminated, however this recommendation It became redundant in light of Mansour’s retirement from the police.
on a check Asaf Shaikh, an intelligence and detective officer of the Nof HaGalil station at the time of the disaster, the committee held Shaikh personally responsible. previously belonged in the meantime to the rank of corporal and the committee recommended that he Will not be promoted in rank or position for four years from the date of submitting the report and that in any decision on promotion in rank or position after the said period of time, the findings and conclusions detailed in his case will be taken into account.
on mr Oded Plusthe director general of the Ministry of Religious Services at the time of the disaster, said that in view of the totality of the circumstances as well as the proper balance between the steps taken by Plus regarding the center, and which led to an improvement, to the remaining gap, and in accordance with the approach that where there remains real doubt in a matter that may lead to unjustified harm to the Mozar, the doubt will act in his favor, The committee decided not to impose personal responsibility on Plus.
on the rabbi Shmuel Rabinowitzthe chairman of the committee of five said that, taking into account the totality of the circumstances in which he acted, and the actions that Rabbi Rabinovitz took to improve the situation, and in accordance with the approach that where there is real doubt in a matter that may lead to unjustified harm to the warden, the doubt will act in his favor, The committee decided not to impose personal responsibility on Rabinowitz.
on mr Meir Karlibach, executive director of the activities of the “Hospitality” association, the committee imposed personal responsibility on Karlibach, as the executive director of the “Hospitality” association. Considering his medical condition, and assuming that he will no longer be active at the Rashbi’s Tomb site, The committee did not recommend a personal recommendation in his case.
ظهرت في الأصل على www.maariv.co.il