Adel Akl reveals the validity of canceling Al-Ahly’s goal in the Al-Ittihad Alexandria match


Adel Akl, the arbitration expert, confirmed that the VAR has set a date to appear in Tuesday’s matches in the 26th round of the Nile League.



Meeting Al-Ahly Al-Ittihad of Alexandria, which ended with Al-Ahmar winning 1-0, and was managed by referee Tarek Magdy, witnessed more than one influential arbitration decision after he intervened with the whistle and awarded 28 violations to the two teams, and the two assistants indicated two cases of offside in accordance with the protocol.


In the 41st minute, Tarek Magdy showed the only yellow card in the match against the Ghanaian Moro Salifu, the Al-Ittihad player, for recklessness, and he also ignored the warning of the Al-Ahly defender. Omar Kamal Abdel Wahed For recklessness.


In the 61st minute, Akram Tawfiq, the Al-Ahly player, scored a goal, and after the correct review of the goal by the VAR, it became clear that there was a violation on Omar Kamal Abdel Wahed during the building stage of the attack, and thus the goal was cancelled, and this is what actually happened after the VAR summoned the referee to the review screen, and he returned. The referee canceled the goal in accordance with the protocol and resumed play with a violation against Al-Ahly in good and fruitful cooperation between the VAR and the referee, and the match goal was correctly reviewed by the VAR.


match Zed vs. Pharco It ended in a 2-2 draw and was administered by first-class referee Walid Abdel Razek, and saw 30 fouls awarded to both teams in an appropriate estimate, the most prominent of which came in the 61st minute, a penalty kick for Z, and the VAR intervened to redo the kick twice because the Pharco goalkeeper moved before executing it, in a good intervention by the VAR.


Then the referee returned and awarded a fake penalty kick in favor of Zed in the 95th minute of the match, and the VAR intervened and summoned the referee to the screen after he spent 3 minutes reviewing the game. Then the referee returned and insisted on his decision to award the fake penalty kick in favor of Zed, from which he scored the equalizing goal in the 102nd minute of the match, which continued. Until the 109th minute, after adding stoppage time at the end of both halves of the match, then VAR intervened and canceled a goal in favor of Pharco in the 43rd minute in a correct decision.


The match between Smouha and the Interior Ministry, which was refereed by Hamada El-Kalawy, was filled with more than one influential arbitration decision, as the referee awarded a penalty kick in favor of the Interior Ministry. He also allowed play to continue in Smouha’s first goal, especially after the Interior Ministry requested a violation immediately before scoring the goal, but play continued and the referee’s decision and the VAR confirmed the decision to be valid. the goal.

ظهرت في الأصل على www.youm7.com

Leave a Comment